Flanagan v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by Thomas P. Flanagan against the City of "Tulsa, a municipal corporation, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DUDLEY, C.
On January 31, 1912, the ■plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, commenced this action in the district court of Tulsa county against the defendants in error, defendants below, to enjoin the collection ■of an alleged illegal paving assessment against lot 8, block 3, Hodge addition to the city of Tulsa, one of the' defendants in error here, and to cancel said assessment, as a cloud upon his title to said lot. The parties will be referred to as they were in the trial court.' The defendants filed a motion to dismiss said action, which was' treated by the court as a general…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Liebermann v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Gardner v. EberhartIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- McGrew v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- American-First National Bank v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- City of Muskogee v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- City of Maud v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Southern Surety Co. v. JaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.