Legal Opinion

Wright v. City of El Reno

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 1934No. 21757PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This appeal involves the resurfacing or reconstruction of certain streets in the city of El Reno, known as paving district No. 12-B.

Plaintiffs sought an injunction to prevent said city from levying and charging any benefit assessment against their property, contending that the improvement did not constitute an original improvement, reconstruction, repaving or renewal, or even doubtful repair, but at the most it was repair work which should be borne by the public rather than by assessment against abutting property owners; that a charge for benefit local permanent improvement had heretofore…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Santa Cruz Rock Pavement Co. v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bettenbrock v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. City of Tulsa v. WestonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Gilfillan v. City of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pratt v. Water District No. 79Washington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Ambrister v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. City of Hazard v. Main Street Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  4. City of Enid ex rel. Versluis v. RobinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API