Harrington v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SWINDALL,' J.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs below, to enjoin the city of Tulsa, the defendant in error, defendant below, and its officers, agents, and employees, from levying a tax or special assessment against the several properties of the plaintiffs for widening the paving on Eleventh street in improvement district No.. 1089, and to enjoin the city and its officers from various other acts in connection with the improvement of such street. At the close of plaintiffs’ evidence, defendant interposed a demurrer, which wag by the court sustained, an injunction…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Terminal Oil Mill Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Harley v. JobeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- City of Shawnee v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Stinson v. ShermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Application of Erick Hospital DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.