Rupp v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This is an action to enjoin the city of Tulsa and its officers from assessing the cost of street improvement against property benefited thereby. Upon the trial defendants were awarded judgment, and therefrom the plaintiffs prosecute this appeal. Herein the plaintiffs in error and defendants in error will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants, respectively.
On June 27, 1947, the board of commissioners of the city of Tulsa, Okla., on authority of section 1, article IX of the City Charter, adopted a resolution declaring the necessity for providing for the improvement by grading, paving,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Sentenis v. . LadewNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- City of Tulsa v. WestonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Grier v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
3Cited by9 opinions
- Corbeil v. Emricks Van & Storage, Guarantee InsuranceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Parker v. Independent School District No. I-003Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Driver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- CORBEIL v. EMRICKS VAN & STORAGESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Medlock v. Admiral Safe Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.