Legal Opinion

Auto-Owners Insurance v. Traviss

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1976No. Docket 27240PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. M. Ryan, J.

This panel is confronted with the narrow legal issue of whether a claimant can "stack” or "pyramid” automobile insurance recovery under the uninsured motorist provisions in the following circumstances: (1) claimant’s decedent was the driver of an insured vehicle involved in a fatal accident; (2) he was not the named insured or a family member of the named insured under the policy; and (3) the named insured’s insurance covered two vehicles under a single policy.

Plaintiff insurance carrier, faced with defendant’s demand for "stacked” benefits under the uninsured motorist coverage, brought an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Boettner v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Citizens Mutual Insurance v. TurnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Roach v. Central National InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Rice v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Babcock v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Konnick v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Guarantee Insurance v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Starr v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Burke v. Aid InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API