Legal Opinion

Rice v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1976No. Docket 24279PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

We are confronted with the issue of whether an exclusion clause within the uninsured motorist coverage section of an automobile insurance policy contravenes public policy prescribed by MCLA 500.3010; MSA 24.13010, 1 insofar as the exclusion applies to one other than a named insured who, under the circumstances in this case, is not an insured under the liability section of the policy.

Plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident with an uninsured motorist on November 18, 1971, as he was operating a 1968 Pontiac titled to him and his mother. Although he carried no automobile insurance on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boettner v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ShellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Roach v. Central National InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Nunley v. TurnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Pappas v. CENTRAL NAT'L INS. GROUP OF OMAHAMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bertini v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. McMillanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Hickman v. Community Service InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API