Legal Opinion
Babcock v. Adkins
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 20, 1984No. 60924PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice:
Patricia Babcock, now Booker, was covered as named insured by four separate insurance policies covering four vehicles. These policies had been issued .by appellant Mid-Continent Casualty Company. Each of the four policies contained uninsúred motorist coverage provisions covering the named insured and other persons occupying an insured vehicle.
At approximately 10:00 p.m., on June 14, 1980, one of these covered vehicles was struck by a vehicle driven by appellant Bobby Jack Adkins. At the time of the accident, Ms. Babcock was driving the insured vehicle and appellees Glen Dale…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. StanfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
- Werley v. United Services Automobile AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Moser v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Ball v. Wilshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- American Economy Insurance Co. v. BogdahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. WendtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Barfield v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.