Legal Opinion

Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1972No. 3 May Term 1972, Docket No. 53,478PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This case along with its two companions of Rowland v Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange, 34 Mich App 267 (1971) and Boettner v State Farm Mutual Ins Co, 34 Mich App 510 (1971) comprise a trilogy of cases presenting issues of first impression since the passage of 1965 PA 388; MCLA 500.3010; MSA 24.13010. This act provides in pertinent part as follows:

«N0 * * * policy * * * shall be delivered * * * unless coverage is provided therein * * * for the protection of persons insured thereunder * * * in limits * * * set forth in [the Motor Vehicle Code 1 ] * * * unless the named insured…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  4. Curran v. State Automobile Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Aldcroft v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Glidden v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. GavinMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Motor Club of America Insurance v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API