Legal Opinion

Burke v. Aid Insurance

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 18, 1980No. Civ. A. 78-1327, 78-1328PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

THEIS, Chief Judge.

These cases come now for decision on plaintiffs’ motions for partial summary judgment. The disputes underlying these cases stem from the same traffic accident and raise identical questions of law.

On May 24, 1975, Leo V. Burke, Meinard M. Meier and James Meier, Meinard Meier’s minor son, were traveling in an automobile owned by Hodgeman County Highway Department, and insured by the defendant, Aid Insurance Company. Meinard Meier was driving. The automobile was struck by another vehicle. That accident was the sole fault of the second vehicle. That car was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Mustang Fuel Corporation, a Corporation v. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. BlakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Gray F. Madison, Sr., and Elizabeth B. Madison, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs v. Deseret Livestock Company, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Harris v. MageeMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Babcock v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Martin v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Miller v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API