Legal Opinion

Boettner v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1972No. 5 May Term 1972, Docket No. 53,628PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The major issues in this case are basically similar to those in Blakeslee v Farm Bureau Mutual Ins Co, 388 'Mich 464 (1972). However, in addition to an "other insurance” clause, an "exclusions” clause is involved here. Also both policies are with the same insurance company. The two issues are:

I. Does the specific language of the (A) "other insurance” limitation against recovery on other insurance policies as well as the primary policy or (B) the separate fail-back "exclusions” clause from recovery on other policies in the uninsured motorist coverage apply to the facts of the instant case?

II.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Deterding v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  3. Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Boettner v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. GavinMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Powers v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Welch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API