Legal Opinion

Konnick v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1985No. 15236PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SOSA, Senior Justice.

Plaintiffs Tiffany Konnick, Richard Steadman and Jo Steadman brought suit for damages and declaratory relief on the grounds that defendant Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona (Farmers) had refused to pay insurance benefits. The four count complaint alleged that Farmers had refused to pay underinsurance benefits due, had intentionally and negligently inflicted emotional distress on plaintiffs and had violated statutory and fiduciary duties owed to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs moved for partial summary judgment as to Count I asking that the court declare their right to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Schmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Claro Gonzales and Tomasa R. Gonzales, by Personal Representative v. Millers Casualty Insurance Company of Texas, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Jimenez v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Rodriguez v. Windsor InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State Farm Mutual Insurance v. ConyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API