Legal Opinion

Pereira v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 9, 2009No. 041010858; A133677PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Attorney Thompson and his law firm, Thompson & Bogran, P.C., (defendants) represented Pereira (plaintiff) on matters relating to a California trust of which plaintiff was a beneficiary. That representation spawned this labyrinthine litigation. Defendants appeal a judgment on a jury verdict on plaintiffs legal negligence claim and on defendants’ breach of contract counterclaims; plaintiff cross-appeals and assigns error to trial court orders directing verdicts for defendants on plaintiffs claims for slander of title and misuse of civil proceedings. For the reasons that follow, we (1) reverse…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Alfieri v. SolomonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. O'Kain v. LandressCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Gibson v. BankofierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Rowlett v. FaganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. SPS of Oregon, Inc. v. GDH, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API