Legal Opinion

Kimmel v. Goland

California Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1990No. S007828PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

51 Cal.3d 202 (1990)

793 P.2d 524

271 Cal. Rptr. 191

DANIEL G. KIMMEL et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents,

v.

MARGARET R. GOLAND, as Trustee, etc., et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants; R. RICHARD FARNELL, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. S007828.

Supreme Court of California.

July 12, 1990.

COUNSEL

Timothy T. Tierney, Cappadona & Oldman and Lyle R. Mink for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Cotkin, Collins & Franscell, William D. Naeve, Sheryl A. Weinstein, Margaret Kathryn Maas and R. Richard Farnell, in pro. per., for Plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API