People v. Woodhead
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
In this case we must decide whether a statute which prohibits commitment to the Youth Authority of any person convicted of a serious felony when he or she was 18 years of age or older at the time of the offense, applies to defendant, who was previously convicted of a serious felony committed when he was 18, but who stands convicted of a nonserious felony in the instant proceeding. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude it does not.
Factual and Procedural Background
In January 1985, defendant, aged 19, broke into a school in Livermore, was apprehended and charged with…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by337 opinions
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. FierroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
332 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.