Legal Opinion

People v. Woodhead

California Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1987No. Crim. 25631PublishedCited by 337 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

In this case we must decide whether a statute which prohibits commitment to the Youth Authority of any person convicted of a serious felony when he or she was 18 years of age or older at the time of the offense, applies to defendant, who was previously convicted of a serious felony committed when he was 18, but who stands convicted of a nonserious felony in the instant proceeding. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude it does not.

Factual and Procedural Background

In January 1985, defendant, aged 19, broke into a school in Livermore, was apprehended and charged with…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by337 opinions

  1. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. FierroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

332 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API