Legal Opinion

Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & Oliker

California Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1989No. L.A. 32267PublishedCited by 341 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARGUELLES, J.

Albert & Oliker (A&O), a law firm, appeals from a judgment entered against it in a malicious prosecution action. The law firm contends that the trial court erred in permitting the case to go to the jury, asserting that the court should have concluded, on the basis of the uncontroverted facts, that Sheldon Appel Company (Sheldon Appel) had failed to establish one of the essential elements of a malicious prosecution action— namely, that the prior action, on which the malicious prosecution claim was based, had been brought “without probable cause.” The Court of Appeal…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by341 opinions

  1. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

336 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API