Legal Opinion

DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1992No. S022331PublishedCited by 297 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

California’s system of “comparative fault” seeks to distribute tort damages proportionately among all who caused the harm. However, even after judicial adoption of the comparative fault system, every culpable tort defendant, regardless of his or her degree of fault, remained “jointly and severally” liable to pay any damages attributable to the fault of others who failed to contribute their proportionate share. This rule of joint and several liability applied not only to the injured person’s “economic” damages, such as medical costs and lost earnings, but to “non-economic”…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by297 opinions

  1. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

292 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API