Legal Opinion

Chia-Lee Hsu v. Abbara

California Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1995No. S037574PublishedCited by 335 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

When a contract contains a provision granting either party the right to recover attorney fees in the event of litigation on the contract, Civil Code section 1717 (hereafter section 1717) gives the “party prevailing on the contract” a right to recover attorney fees, whether or not that party is the party specified in the contract. It defines the phrase “party prevailing on the contract” as “the party who recovered a greater relief in the action on the contract,” and it provides that a trial court “may also determine that there is no party prevailing on the contract for…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Kimmel v. GolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by335 opinions

  1. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007

330 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API