Legal Opinion

Burden v. Snowden

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1992No. S021885PublishedCited by 276 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

We granted review in this case to determine the narrow issue whether a person hired by a city police department as a “police recruit” is entitled to coverage under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (hereafter the Bill of Rights Act or the Act) (Gov. Code, § 3300 et seq.). Our examination of the legislative scheme, its history and extrinsic aids leads us to conclude that the Act was not intended to apply to the recruit classification; therefore, a recruit is not entitled to coverage under the Act. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Tapia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by276 opinions

  1. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API