Burden v. Snowden
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
We granted review in this case to determine the narrow issue whether a person hired by a city police department as a “police recruit” is entitled to coverage under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (hereafter the Bill of Rights Act or the Act) (Gov. Code, § 3300 et seq.). Our examination of the legislative scheme, its history and extrinsic aids leads us to conclude that the Act was not intended to apply to the recruit classification; therefore, a recruit is not entitled to coverage under the Act. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Tapia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by276 opinions
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.