Legal Opinion
LiMandri v. Judkins
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 28, 1997No. D022106PublishedCited by 262 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff Charles S. LiMandri appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the court sustained defendant Greg D. Judkins’s demurrer to LiMandri’s complaint without leave to amend as to all causes of action.
Factual and Procedural Background
Because this is an appeal of a judgment of dismissal entered after the sustaining of a general demurrer, . . we accept as true all the material allegations of the complaint.” (Shoemaker v. Myers (1990) 52 Cal.3d 1, 7 [276 Cal.Rptr. 303, 801 P.2d 1054, 20 A.L.R.5Ü1 1016].) LiMandri’s complaint discloses the following facts.
LiMan…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by262 opinions
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Wilson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Isuzu Motors Ltd. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
257 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.