Legal Opinion

Rusheen v. Cohen

California Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2006No. S123203PublishedCited by 347 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

39 Cal.Rptr.3d 516 (2006)

37 Cal.4th 1048

128 P.3d 713

Terry RUSHEEN, Cross-Complainant and Appellant,

v.

Barry E. COHEN et al., Cross-Defendants and Respondents.

No. S123203.

Supreme Court of California.

February 23, 2006.

Law Office of Robert F. Henry and Robert F. Henry, Culver City, for Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, John R. Feliton, Jr., Elizabeth G. O'Donnell and Raul L. Martinez, Los Angeles, for Cross-defendants and Respondents.

Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney and Mark E. Ellis, Sacramento, for California Association of Collectors, National Association of…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by347 opinions

  1. Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Estate of Heiser v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  3. Action Apartment Ass'n v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Russell Johnson, Iii v. Lucent Technologies Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Liberty Synergistics Inc. v. Microflo Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

342 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API