Legal Opinion

Brezinka v. Bystrom Bros., Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 1987No. C9-86-1905PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

We hold the law of the case as determined by the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) yields to the legal rule subsequently announced by this court. We reverse the WCCA and reinstate the compensation judge’s decision.

The dependents of deceased employee Richard Brezinka brought this proceeding for benefits against the employer, Bystrom Brothers, Inc., and its insurer following Brezinka’s death on May 29, 1980. The key issue was the manner of calculating dependency benefits. The compensation judge decided, for the purpose of the calculations, that the employee’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holen v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Lange v. Nelson-Ryan Flight Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Sands v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Peterson v. Johnson Nut Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Goneau v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Tien Fu Hsu v. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of LondonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Marriage of Dobrin v. DobrinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Olsen v. Special School Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API