Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Johnson Nut Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 7, 1941No. 32,588PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 297 N.W. 178. Action to enjoin defendant from competing in business with plaintiffs in certain territory. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal from the order denying a new trial.

A former appeal in this action is reported in 204 Minn. 300,283 N.W. 561. The controlling legal questions were there exhaustively treated and determined. So determined, they became the law of the case to be applied upon the new trial. 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig. (2 ed. Supps.) §§ 398, 404, 454; First State Bank v. First State Bank, 172 Minn. 223, 214 N.W. 781. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Johnson Nut Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Winona & St. Peter Railroad v. St. Paul & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  3. True v. Citizens Fund Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. Longman v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. First State Bk. of Odessa v. First St. Bk. of CorrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.(Arwell Div.) v. BurnettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. Faust v. ParrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Brezinka v. Bystrom Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Marquardt v. StarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API