Marriage of Dobrin v. Dobrin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
We review the decision of the court of appeals affirming the trial court’s award on remand of permanent spousal maintenance in the monthly amount of $2,975 to Mary Louise Dobrin, n/k/a Mary Louise Erickson. Dobrin v. Dobrin, 555 N.W.2d 921 (Minn.App.1996). In recognition of the continuing debate over the circumstances in which permanent spousal maintenance is appropriate within the guidelines of Minn.Stat. § 518.552 and our recent decision in Gales v. Gales, 553 N.W.2d 416 (Minn.1996), we take this opportunity to address the question again in what might best be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Lange v. Nelson-Ryan Flight Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Marriage of Kornberg v. KornbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Peterson v. BASF Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Marriage of Prahl v. PrahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Marriage of Chamberlain v. ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Wheeler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.