Legal Opinion

Holen v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 21, 1957No. 37,241, 37,242PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

In each of two actions involving the same issues, consolidated for trial and for review by this court, defendant Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission appeals from a summary judgment for the plaintiffs. In one of said actions defendant banks appeal.

Plaintiffs, property owners residing in the vicinity of the Wold Chamberlain Field airport (herein referred to as Wold Chamberlain), brought these actions on their own behalf as taxpayers and in behalf of all other taxpayers in the city of Minneapolis against the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
  2. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Deal v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API