Tien Fu Hsu v. County of Clark
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court, Maupin, C. J.:
In this appeal, we determine whether this court should adopt equitable exceptions to the law of the case doctrine. We also revisit the prior decision we issued in the first appeal of this airspace takings case, given our intervening decision in McCarran International Airport v. Sisolak 2 which set forth a new scheme for analyzing airspace takings claims. We conclude that, in some instances, equitable considerations justify a departure from the doctrine that the principles set forth in a first appeal are the law of the case on all subsequent proceedings.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Carmona v. CarmonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- Dictor v. Creative Management Services, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Bielar v. Washoe Health Systems, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Montoya v. Ahern (In re W.N. Connell & Marjorie T. Connell Living Trust, Dated May 18, 1972)Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.