Legal Opinion

Sands v. American Railway Express Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 4, 1924No. 23,782PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action in the district court of Stearns county to recover for the loss of trunks. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. On a former appeal the order denying a new trial was affirmed. 154 Minn. 308, 197 N. W. 721. Upon the going down of the remittitur judgment *26was entered for the plaintiff upon the verdict for the full value of the property. The defendant appeals from the judgment.

At the first hearing on the former appeal it was held that there was an actual conversion. The effect of the failure on the part of the shipper to sign the shipping receipt was left undecided. A reargument was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. American Railway Express Co. v. LindenburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. American Railway Express Co. v. LeveeSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Standard Lithographing Co. v. Twin City Motor Speedway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Sands v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marriage of Dobrin v. DobrinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Brezinka v. Bystrom Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Peterson v. BASF Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. In Re Estate of HallbomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. VanDyke v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API