Legal Opinion
Goneau v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 4, 1924No. 23,810PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendant appeals from the order denying its motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
On a former appeal (154 Minn. 1, 191 N. W. 279) defendant’s right to judgment upon a record substantially like the present was denied. This is conceded to be the law of the case now, unless the Federal Supreme Court has in the meantime expressed an opinion that is out of harmony therewith. For that court is the final authority involving the application of the acts of Congress upon which this action is predicated, and our duty is to follow its rulings even to…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. WilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. GotschallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. LaytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Davis v. WolfeSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ConartySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. GoneauSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Brezinka v. Bystrom Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re Estate of HallbomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- City of Waseca v. BraunSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Pagel v. MacLeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.