Legal Opinion
In Re Williams
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 9, 2010No. 06-BG-682PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAMER, Associate Judge:
This matter comes before this court as a result of discipline imposed upon Stephen J. Williams by the Connecticut Superior Court. The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) recommends that we impose the non-identical reciprocal discipline of a six-month suspension with a fitness requirement. We agree -with its recommendation of a six-month suspension but we conclude that Mr. Williams’s conduct warrants the imposition of a requirement that he complete an ethics and practice course before he is reinstated, rather than that he make the full reinstatement showing.
I.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Matter of VelasquezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re BenjaminDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re De MaioDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re SaloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- In Re ScottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re CarithersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Com. v. O. RileyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.