Legal Opinion

In re Carithers

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 2012No. 11-BG-1405PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Associate Judge:

On July 18, 2011, the Maryland Court of Appeals found that respondent Michael R. Carithers, Jr., had misappropriated fees, commingled funds, and violated several rules of professional conduct. The court disbarred him, effective August 17, 2011, Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Carithers, 421 Md. 28, 25 A.3d 181, 199 (2011), and the District of Columbia’s Bar Counsel now recommends that we impose identical reciprocal discipline. Respondent argues that the presumption in favor of identical reciprocal discipline should not apply because the District of Columbia would have…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. In Re KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. In Re SlatteryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. In Re JacobyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re David A. VeselDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. In re FoxDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API