Legal Opinion
In Re De Maio
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 2, 2006No. 04-BG-244PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
In this reciprocal discipline proceeding against respondent Louis J. De Maio, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for eighteen months and required to demonstrate fitness prior to reinstatement. Although Bar Counsel initially urged that respondent receive the identical reciprocal discipline of disbarment, the Board recommended otherwise, and Bar Counsel has informed us that he takes no exception to the report and recommendation of the Board.1 Respondent…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re PenningtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re GubermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re Stephen T.YelvertonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In Re LeaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re SaloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.