Legal Opinion

In Re Cater

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 2005No. 03-BG-624PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

Rozan E. Cater, an attorney who was admitted to the Bar of this Court in 1989, is the respondent in four consolidated disciplinary matters coming to us with a report and recommendation from the Board on Professional Responsibility. 1 In the first matter, a closely divided Board would absolve respondent of ethical misconduct in connection with her former secretary’s embezzlement of over $47,000 from the estates of two incapacitated adults for whom respondent was the court-appointed guardian and conservator. In the other three matters, the Board has found misconduct in…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Wood v. NeumanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. In Re GubermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. In Re De MaioDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. In re VohraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API