Legal Opinion
In Re Artis
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 8, 2005No. 03-BG-211PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Associate Judge:
The Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) has recommended that respondent, Paris A. Artis, be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for thirty days with his reinstatement conditioned upon his compliance with Bar Counsel’s subpoena duces tecum and an order of this court enforcing it. The proposed discipline is based on the report and recommendation of a Hearing Committee that respondent had violated D.C. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(d) (conduct that seriously interferes with the administration of justice) and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 2(b)(3)…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Solers, Inc. v. DoeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re Stephen T.YelvertonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.