Legal Opinion
In re Salo
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 18, 2012No. 11-BG-1433PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BECKWITH, Associate Judge:
On July 27, 2010, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Judicial Department (“the New York court”) found respondent Frederick W. Salo guilty of nonvenal misappropriation of funds and related offenses and suspended him from the practice of law in New York for one year, effective August 26, 2010. Matter of Salo, 77 A.D.3d 30, 39, 906 N.Y.S.2d 16 (N.Y.App.Div.2010). The District of Columbia Office of Bar Counsel now recommends that we impose reciprocal discipline and likewise suspend Mr. Salo for one year with a fitness requirement.1 Mr. Salo argues that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re ChagantiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- In re CarithersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In Re Matthew Ragaller (Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Appellant)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2025
- In re David H. LoomisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re Sandy ChangDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.