Legal Opinion

In re Williams

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 4, 2012No. Case No. 3:05-GP-18(RNC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING AND ORDER

ROBERT N. CHATIGNY, District Judge.

This grievance proceeding presents the question whether reciprocal discipline should be imposed on respondent Stephen John Williams, a member of the bar of this Court, based on a suspension order of the Connecticut Superior Court, which has become final.

Local Rule 83.2(f)(2) provides that on a presentment of the Grievance Committee petitioning the Court to impose reciprocal discipline, the identical discipline must be imposed unless it clearly appears on the face of the record in the prior disciplinary proceeding:

a. that the procedure was so…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Pinsky v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Burton v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fed. Grievance Comm. v. Josephine S. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  2. Williams v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
  3. Williams v. Trans Union, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API