Legal Opinion
Lewis v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 6, 2005No. SC 17006PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, Walter J. Lewis, Jr., has standing under General Statutes § 22a-161 to challenge: (1) the decision of the defendant inland wetlands and conserva*385tion commission of the town of Clinton (commission) approving the application of the defendant Chelsea G.C.A. Realty Partnership, L.P.2 (Chelsea) for a permit to conduct certain regulated activities in connection with the development of the Clinton Crossing Premium Outlet Center (Clinton Crossing);3 and (2) the propriety of Chelsea’s construction of a storm drainage system…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. RocqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Fish Unlimited v. Northeast Utilities Service Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Lewis v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
3Cited by13 opinions
- Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Burton v. COM'R OF ENV. PROTECTIONSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Soracco v. Williams Scotsman, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Moutinho v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.