Legal Opinion
Fish Unlimited v. Northeast Utilities Service Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 1, 2000No. SC 16268PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiffs1 have standing under General *23Statutes § 22a-16* 2 to bring this action in Superior Court against the defendants,3 seeking: (1) an injunction to prevent the operation of Millstone Nuclear Power Generating Station (Millstone); and (2) a declaratory judgment that the discharge permit, issued to the defendants by the department of environmental protection (department) pursuant to the federal Clean Water Act, is invalid.4 The trial court rendered judgment dismissing *24the complaint, having concluded that the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- City of Middletown v. Hartford Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Quarry Knoll II Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.