Legal Opinion
Soracco v. Williams Scotsman, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 9, 2009No. SC 17856PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
This is an appeal by the intervening plaintiff, Manafort Brothers, Inc. (Manafort), from the trial court’s order regarding the allocation of proceeds of a settlement reached in the underlying negligence action brought by the plaintiffs, Joseph Soracco and his spouse, Cheryl Soracco, 1 against the named defendant, Williams Scotsman, Inc., and the defendant E&F/Walsh Building Company, LLC. 2 On appeal, Manafort claims that the trial court (1) improperly considered facts not in evidence in determining that the equal apportionment of the settlement proceeds between the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Izzo v. Colonial Penn InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Durniak v. August Winter & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Peters v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- City of Middletown v. Hartford Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Thomas v. Department of Developmental ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- New England Estates, LLC v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Demond v. Project Service, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Cornelius v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.