Legal Opinion
Moutinho v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 20, 2006No. SC 17558PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
The plaintiffs, Manuel Moutinho and J.R.R.C. Associates (J.R.R.C.), appeal 1 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction their zoning appeal from the decision of the named defendant, 2 the planning and zoning commission of the city of Bridgeport (commission), denying certain applications filed by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly concluded that Moutinho was not aggrieved by the commission’s decision and that J.R.R.C. had no right to bring an appeal, despite the fact that it was statutorily…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Bossert Corp. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- DiBonaventura v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Bongiorno Supermarket, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cambodian Buddhist Society of Connecticut, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Mayer v. Historic Dist. Comm'n of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Wucik v. PLANNING AND ZONING COM'N OF TOWN OF PRESTONConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Concerned Citizens for the Preservation of Watertown, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Jz, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.