Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Phinney

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 2013No. OSB 10-68; SC S060529PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Bar alleged that the accused, who admitted taking substantial funds from the Yale Alumni Association of Oregon, violated Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 8.4(a)(2), which prohibits criminal conduct that reflects adversely on a lawyer’s honesty and trustworthiness, and RPC 8.4(a)(3), which prohibits conduct involving dishonesty and misrepresentation that reflects adversely on a lawyer’s fitness to practice law. The trial panel found that the accused had violated both rules and imposed the sanction of disbarment. The accused appealed, arguing for a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KimmellOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re Complaint of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EllisOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. FonteOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HermanOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. In re LongOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  5. In re Ellis / RosenbaumOregon Supreme Court · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API