Legal Opinion

Manos v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1911No. Docket No. 191PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Case by Julia Manos against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The facts in this case are practically undisputed. The plaintiff herself testified that, on a rainy afternoon in June, she came from a store to a street corner, carrying an umbrella. Before attempting to cross the street, she looked and saw a car approaching about half a block away. It was 11£ feet from the curb where she stood to the-nearest rail. She proceeded, and did not look again; was struck by the car which she had seen, and was injured. The learned circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendant, holding that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence in not looking…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mynning v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Haas v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Mynning v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Fritz v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. McGee v. Consolidated Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Colborne v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Molby v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Champaign v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  5. Downey v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API