Legal Opinion

Haas v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1882PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. Case. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOooley, J.

The plaintiff as administrator of the estate of Adrian Leenders, deceased, sued the railroad company for causing the death of his intestate by negligently running one of its trains so as to collide with his team while he was crossing its track in passing along the public highway. In the circuit court the case was taken from the jury by the instruction of the judge that they should return a verdict for the defendant. The instruction seems to have been given because in the opinion of the judge the declaration united two inconsistent causes of action; but as the plaintiff ■was suffered to put in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. LeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Toledo Wabash, & Western Railway Co. v. ShuckmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Pakalinsky v. . N.Y. Cent. Hud. R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Gillett v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Mynning v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Gratiot v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Heddles v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1889

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API