Legal Opinion

Colborne v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1913No. Docket No. 89PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Error to Wayne; Van Zile, J. Case by Harriet Colborne against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant upon a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action ex delicto in the circuit court of Wayne county to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her in a collision between one of defendant’s street cars and an automobile in which she was riding. In the trial court, at the conclusion of the testimony, a verdict in favor of defendant was directed by the court, on the ground that the driver of the automobile was, as a matter of law, guilty of such contributory negligence as to preclude recovery.

*141This accident occurred at the intersection of Oakland and Holbrook avenues in the city of Detroit on the evening of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McGee v. Consolidated Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Manos v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Mullen v. City of OwossoMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Borschall v. Detroit RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Merritt v. FooteMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Davis v. ThorntonMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Melconian v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Fox v. LavenderUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Holsaple v. Menominee Sup'ts of PoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Munson v. RupkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API