Fritz v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Lillibridge, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is a case of collision. There was testimony tending to show that plaintiff was driving north on Woodward avenue in the city of Detroit, in a milk wagon. It was covered at the sides and behind. There was an opening of two feet wide opposite the driver’s seat. In front there was an opening across the wagon about two feet in depth, between the dashboard and the hood. This and the openings at the sides were the only aperatures through which plaintiff could look out, as his back curtain was down. On the left side of the wagon he had 11 or 12 empty milk cans, each three or four feet high. He…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Watson v. Minneapolis Street-Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Laethem v. Fort Wayne & Belle Isle Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Citizens' Street Railway v. SteenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
- Boerth v. West Side RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by39 opinions
- Manos v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Rouse v. Detroit Electric RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Ryan v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Young v. Citizens' Street RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Butler v. Rockland, Thomaston & Camden Street RailwaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.