Legal Opinion

McGee v. Consolidated Street Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1894PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Error to superior court of Grand Rapids. (Burlingame, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Plaintiff brought suit-to recover damages for the loss of a foot, claiming it was occasioned by the negligent act of the defendant street-railway company in running one of its electric cars over him. The accident occurred at the intersection of South Division street and Fifth avenue, in the city of Grand Rapids, while plaintiff was attempting to cross the company's tracks, in the dusk of a dark and wet evening, on November 26, 1892. The defendant has parallel double tracks on South Division street, which is fiat and level where it crosses Fifth avenue at right angles. The company runs its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Creamer v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Gardner v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Rascher v. East Detroit & Grosse Pointe Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Salter v. . Utica and Black River Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Houghton v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. Lansing City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Colborne v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Laufer v. Bridgeport Traction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  4. Ames v. Waterloo & Cedar Falls Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Chauvin v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API