Legal Opinion

Downey v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1925No. Docket No. 17PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

On November 6, 1922, plaintiff received injuries to his person and property by reason of the collision of a taxicab which he was driving with one of defendant’s locomotives, for which the jury awarded him damages in the sum of $24,013.07. Defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, made at the conclusion of the proofs, on the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, having been reserved, was renewed after verdict and a judgment entered in its favor. This judgment plaintiff reviews by writ of error. The assignments all relate to the 'action of the court in entering the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Manos v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Molby v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Britten v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Sheets v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Eisele v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rushford-Surine v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Richman v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Benaway v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Ackerman v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Thomas v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API