Legal Opinion

Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. Harris

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 21, 1918PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court, Part II, of the city of Richmond, in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the Court

Whittle, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a personal injury action in which the judgment under review, awarding damages to the defendant in error, was rendered against the plaintiff in error upon its demurrer to the evidence.

The Virginia Railway and Power Company owns and operates a double track electric line in the city of Richmond, which along Main street runs east and west. The westbound track is located' north of the center line of the street, while the east-bound track is placed south of that line. The plaintiff was the only witness who testified in the case. His evidence,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Manos v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. BoltzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  3. State v. ShourSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Springs v. Virginia Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  5. Fowler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Washington & Old Dominion Railway v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  2. Cashell v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1929
  3. Hendry v. Virginia Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  4. Derring's Administrator v. Virginia Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  5. Gordon v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API