Legal Opinion

Sutter County v. Tisdale

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1900No. Sac. No. 722PublishedCited by 12 opinions

MOTION to dismiss appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sutter County and from an order denying a new trial. E. A. Davis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment upon the ground that it was not taken within the time allowed by law must he granted. The judgment appealed from was entered October 22, 1898, and the notice of appeal was not given until June 28, 1899. The respondent has also moved to dismiss the appeal from the order denying a new trial, upon the grounds that no notice of the intention to move therefor was served on certain of the codefendants, and also -that the notice of appeal was not served upon said codefendants, and that the' transcript fails to contain any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heinlen v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Knowlton v. MackenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Estate of YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Streby v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Mendini v. MilnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Tucker v. ThravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API