Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Thraves

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 5, 1915No. 3936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Nowata >County; T. L. Brown, Judge. Action between W. E. Tucker and another and ■ W. V. Thraves. From the judgment the parties first mentioned bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtRiddle, J.

A motion is made hr dismiss on the ground that the ease-made was never filed with the papers in the case in the trial court. The case-made does not contain the file mark or the stamp, of the clerk showing the same to' have been filed. There is also presented the affidavit of the clerk to the effect that the case-made was filed with the papers in said cause. In response to this motion is presented a certificate of the clerk of the trial court, showing that on civil docket No. 3, at page 46, appears the following entries relative to said cause:

“March 26th, 1912; ease-made entered, 25 cents;…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. O'KeefeTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Norris v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Heinlen v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State v. MayoWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. McDaniel v. Columbus Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Voris v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Mendini v. MilnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. De Bolt v. Farmers' Exchange BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. School Dist. No. 26 of Okmulgee County v. HinchieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Commerce Acceptance Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API