Knowlton v. Mackenzie
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. T. H. Reardon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The defendant Mackenzie was engaged as a stockbroker in San Francisco, and on the 3d of December, 1886, made an assignment for the benefit of his creditors to C. H. Kaufman, the appellant herein, under the provisions of title III, part II, division' IV, of the Civil Code, and on the same day transferred to him ■certain money and other personal property. Included in the property so transferred were certain mining stocks belonging to M. H. McDonald, which were subsequently sold by Kaufman under directions from one Scott, to whom McDonald had transferred her claim agáinst Mackenzie, and for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Egan v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Broder v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Smith v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Janin v. BrowneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Kellogg v. GilbertNew York Supreme Court · 1813
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Linsk v. LinskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Berry v. ChitwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Bacigalupi v. BacigalupiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Fletcher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.