Legal Opinion

Streby v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The Industrial Accident Commission, by its attorney, challenged the right of the plaintiff to a hearing in the Circuit Court. By a written motion to dismiss, filed in that court, it averred, in effect, that the Circuit Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal “for the reason that the notice of-appeal filed herein is fatally defective.”

An appeal cannot be taken without proper notice of appeal, and a notice of appeal that is “fatally defective” is not an effective process within the meaning of the law creating and regulating appeals.

Now, examining this written motion for the purpose of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Stephens v. ConleyMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Kelley's Dependents v. Hoosac Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  5. In Re the Estate & Guardianship of EikerenkotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harris v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Appleton v. Oregon Iron & Steel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Martelli v. RA Chambers and AssociatesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Vient v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Union Central Life Insurance v. Deschutes Valley Loan Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API